What Are the Potential Risks of Escalating the Gaza Conflict? — Harvard Gazette

Published:

A Year of Turmoil: The Ongoing Conflict in Gaza and Its Broader Implications

A year ago, the world witnessed a devastating terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, igniting a conflict that has since spiraled into a full-scale war in Gaza. This conflict has claimed tens of thousands of lives and has recently begun to extend its reach into neighboring Lebanon and Iran. As the situation continues to evolve, the question looms: what happens next?

A Day of Remembrance

On the anniversary of the attack, scholars at the Harvard Kennedy School gathered to reflect on the profound losses experienced by many families. Meghan O’Sullivan, director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at HKS, opened the panel with a somber acknowledgment of the day. “It is a day of remembrance for many who lost loved ones a year ago today in the terrorist attacks by Hamas and those who lost loved ones in the many, many deaths that have occurred since that time,” she stated. This moment of reflection set the tone for a discussion that would delve into the complexities of the ongoing conflict.

The Role of Iran in the Escalation

A significant focus of the discussion was the role of Iran, a long-standing adversary of Israel, in the current crisis. Just last week, Iran launched a major ballistic missile attack on Israel—an act that marked only the second direct attack on the country by Iran. Iranian officials claimed the missile strikes were retaliation for the killing of a Hamas leader in Tehran by Israeli forces in July, a claim that Israel has not confirmed.

This missile attack has been widely interpreted as a dangerous escalation in the already volatile relationship between Israel and Iran. O’Sullivan emphasized the shift in the dynamics of the conflict, stating, “We have moved away from a decade-long war between Israel and Iran by proxy to a place where now Israel and Iran are in conflict with each other directly.” This direct confrontation raises the stakes significantly, not just for the two nations involved, but for the entire region.

Insights from Experts

The panel featured a diverse group of experts, including Edward Djerejian, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel; Gidi Grinstein, an Israeli entrepreneur and former peace negotiator; Karim Sadjadpour, an Iranian-American policy analyst; and Omar H. Rahman, a senior fellow with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs. Together, they explored Israel’s military strategy, Iran’s involvement, and the potential role of the United States in the evolving conflict.

Djerejian praised Israel’s tactical victories in degrading Hamas’ capabilities and targeting Hezbollah’s leadership but raised concerns about the lack of a coherent long-term strategy. “What about the day after?” he questioned, highlighting the need for a sustainable resolution rather than mere tactical successes.

The Human Cost of Conflict

Rahman offered a more critical perspective on Israel’s actions, arguing that the ongoing military operations are creating a “bottomless pit of despair, trauma, anguish, anger,” which will perpetuate resistance movements like Hamas and Hezbollah for generations. He urged the U.S. to reconsider its role in the conflict, questioning whether American taxpayers should continue to support what he described as an indefinite Israeli war on the region.

Grinstein suggested that the conflict could end swiftly if Hamas were to surrender, yet he acknowledged the profound tragedy unfolding in Gaza. “To look at the other side and feel their tragedy as well, because there is an unimaginable tragedy happening in Gaza,” he remarked, emphasizing the need for compassion amidst the chaos.

The Future of Iran’s Role

As the discussion turned to Iran, Sadjadpour expressed skepticism about the prospects for peace. He argued that meaningful stability in the Middle East is unlikely until Iran is governed by a regime that prioritizes national interests over revolutionary ideology. “I won’t say democratic, but whose organizing principle is not the revolutionary ideology of 1979,” he stated, underscoring the challenges that lie ahead.

Conclusion: A Complex Path Forward

The panel at Harvard Kennedy School illuminated the multifaceted nature of the conflict in Gaza and its broader implications for the Middle East. As the situation continues to evolve, the need for a comprehensive strategy that addresses the underlying issues becomes increasingly urgent. The discussions highlighted the importance of understanding the human cost of conflict, the complexities of regional politics, and the potential for a future that prioritizes peace over perpetual warfare. As the world watches, the question remains: what will the next chapter in this ongoing saga hold?

Related articles

Recent articles